A man and woman who shared an apartment were arrested and charged with murder. The woman's attorney moved to have the defendants tried separately. The motion was granted. The woman was tried first and was acquitted of the crime. The man's trial began one month later. The man's attorney called a witness, who was now living with the man, to testify that, shortly after she was acquitted of murder, the woman had told the witness that she (the woman) had killed the victim because the victim owed her money, and that the man was not involved at all in the victim's death. Is the witness's testimony admissible? Group of answer choices Yes, as a statement by a co-conspirator. No, because the woman is estopped from contradicting the jury verdict of acquittal. No, because it is hearsay not within any exception. Yes, as a declaration against penal interest