A man who belonged to an ancient religion whose rituals require the use of bald eagle feathers traveled to an area where bald eagles were known to roost. After searching the area, he found a fallen eagle feather and returned home. A few weeks later, the man showed the feather to an acquaintance, who happened to be a state park ranger, and explained how the feather was obtained. The ranger informed the man that a state anti-poaching law makes any possession of a bald eagle feather without a special permit a crime. The ranger then cited the man for possession of the feather and confiscated it. At the man's trial for violating the state bald eagle feather possession statute, which of the following constitutional arguments is most appropriate for the prosecution to make? Group of answer choices The government has a substantial and important interest in protecting bald eagles and there is no other feasible way to achieve the legislative purpose. The statute is a neutral law that only incidentally burdens the man's rights under the First Amendment. The Free Exercise Clause applies only to belief and not to conduct. Making an exception for the man on religious grounds would violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment