Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

A manufacturing company acik sdn bhd plans to implement ERP in order to improve its production performance by integrating all production and purchasing activities with

image text in transcribed

A manufacturing company acik sdn bhd plans to implement ERP in order to improve its production performance by integrating all production and purchasing activities with the financial system. To realize this, you as a business analyst are asked to help carry out an ex ante evaluation, especially cost & benefit analysis of the implementation plan, assuming 1 year of preparation, 2 years of transition and 2 years of full implementation. The data collected are as follows: Initial investment fee (in Thousands of USD) 0 2 3 4 5 -2500 -1000 -1000 -1000 No cost category 1 SAP License 2 Implementor Partner Fee Cost of procurement of 3 special servers 4 Hours of Internal Staff 5 Internal staff training costs -100 -50 -100 -100 -50 -100 -50 Operating costs Annual maintenance fee is required after ERP purchase of US 100,000,- Costs and Benefits of the Functional Fit Analysis & Risk Analysis 0 1 2 3 4 5 No cost category the results of the Functional 1 Fit. Analysis the results of the analysis of 2 Risk Analysis -90 75 75 75 75 75 -200 -200 -300 -100 -100 -100 Benefits of SAP implementation The impact of the SAP implementation will be an annual cost savings of USD 2.850.000,- REQUIRED 1. Based on these data, is the ERP implementation feasible at ACIK sdn bhd? Include the results of the calculation of the NPV with a cost of capital = 10%. (please see the table of interest and add assumptions to taste) 2.and Select one: a. Not Appropriate for all scenarios b. only feasible to run with low risk scenario c. Appropriate to run, both with high risk scenario and low risk scenario d. only feasible to run with high risk scenario note: this is the table Periode 2 3 4 F/P:10%:n 1.100 1,210 1,331 1,464 1,611 1,772 1.949 2,144 2.358 2,594 5 6 7 IP/F:10%) 0.909 0826 0,751 0,683 0621 0,564 0.513 0467 0424 0,386 (P/A:10%) 0,909 1,736 2,487 3,170 3.791 (A/P:10%:n) 1,100 0,576 0,402 0,315 0.264 0,230 0,205 0.187 0.174 0.163 IF/P:14%:n) (P/F;14%:n) 1,140 0,877 1,300 0,769 1,482 0,675 1,689 0,592 1,925 0,519 2,195 0,456 2,502 0,400 2,853 0,351 3.252 0.308 3,707 0,270 (A/P:14%) 1,140 0,607 0,431 0,343 0,291 0,257 0,233 0,216 0,202 0,192 IP/A:14;n) 0,877 1,64) 2,322 2,914 3,433 3,889 4,283 4.639 4.946 5,216 4868 5,335 5.759 6,145 9 10 A manufacturing company acik sdn bhd plans to implement ERP in order to improve its production performance by integrating all production and purchasing activities with the financial system. To realize this, you as a business analyst are asked to help carry out an ex ante evaluation, especially cost & benefit analysis of the implementation plan, assuming 1 year of preparation, 2 years of transition and 2 years of full implementation. The data collected are as follows: Initial investment fee (in Thousands of USD) 0 2 3 4 5 -2500 -1000 -1000 -1000 No cost category 1 SAP License 2 Implementor Partner Fee Cost of procurement of 3 special servers 4 Hours of Internal Staff 5 Internal staff training costs -100 -50 -100 -100 -50 -100 -50 Operating costs Annual maintenance fee is required after ERP purchase of US 100,000,- Costs and Benefits of the Functional Fit Analysis & Risk Analysis 0 1 2 3 4 5 No cost category the results of the Functional 1 Fit. Analysis the results of the analysis of 2 Risk Analysis -90 75 75 75 75 75 -200 -200 -300 -100 -100 -100 Benefits of SAP implementation The impact of the SAP implementation will be an annual cost savings of USD 2.850.000,- REQUIRED 1. Based on these data, is the ERP implementation feasible at ACIK sdn bhd? Include the results of the calculation of the NPV with a cost of capital = 10%. (please see the table of interest and add assumptions to taste) 2.and Select one: a. Not Appropriate for all scenarios b. only feasible to run with low risk scenario c. Appropriate to run, both with high risk scenario and low risk scenario d. only feasible to run with high risk scenario note: this is the table Periode 2 3 4 F/P:10%:n 1.100 1,210 1,331 1,464 1,611 1,772 1.949 2,144 2.358 2,594 5 6 7 IP/F:10%) 0.909 0826 0,751 0,683 0621 0,564 0.513 0467 0424 0,386 (P/A:10%) 0,909 1,736 2,487 3,170 3.791 (A/P:10%:n) 1,100 0,576 0,402 0,315 0.264 0,230 0,205 0.187 0.174 0.163 IF/P:14%:n) (P/F;14%:n) 1,140 0,877 1,300 0,769 1,482 0,675 1,689 0,592 1,925 0,519 2,195 0,456 2,502 0,400 2,853 0,351 3.252 0.308 3,707 0,270 (A/P:14%) 1,140 0,607 0,431 0,343 0,291 0,257 0,233 0,216 0,202 0,192 IP/A:14;n) 0,877 1,64) 2,322 2,914 3,433 3,889 4,283 4.639 4.946 5,216 4868 5,335 5.759 6,145 9 10

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Accounting and Auditing Research Tools and Strategies

Authors: Thomas Weirich, Thomas Pearson, Natalie Tatiana

9th edition

1119441915, 1119441919, 978-1-119-3737, 9781119373629 , 978-1119441915

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

How does that affect your approach to complaint handling?

Answered: 1 week ago