A marketing manager of a realty company conducts a study on how three advertisement strategies accounted sales differ based on the average monthly closed deal. Test the hypothesis at a significant level of 0.05 Sales Agent House to House Social Media Radio Advertisement 1 89 94 85 2 78 88 88 3 75 90 90 4 65 95 80 80 92 79 6 90 85 80Null Hypothesis: There is no Significant relationship between the formulation and 0 speed. Alternative Hypothesis: There is significant relationship between the formulation and speed. Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the number of closed deals 0 between the three advertisement strategies. Alternative Hypothesis: At least one mean number of closed deals is different. Null Hypothesis: There is significant difference in the number of closed deals between C) the three advertisement strategies. Alternative Hypothesis: There is no signicant difference in the number of closed deals between the three advertisement strategies. Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference between the three advertisement 0 strategies. Alternative Hypothesis: There is significant difference between the three advertisement strategies. O Two-Way ANOVA O Mann-Whitney U Test O Time Series Analysis O Kruskal-Wallis Test O Point Biserial Correlation Coefficient O Kendall Tau\fO 11.0354 O 9.7652 O 10.8544 O 10.5844 O 10.4584O 26.296 5.991 O 12.592 9.7652 O 27.587\fO Reject Ho and accept Ha: At least one mean number of closed deals is different. O Reject Ho and accept Ha: There is no significant difference in the number of closed deals between the three advertisement strategies. O Accept the Null Hypothesis: At least one mean number of closed deals is different. Accept the Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the number of closed O deals between the three advertisement strategies