A Moving to another question will save this response. Question 5 of 60 Question 5 1 points Save Answer In the case of Crocker v Sundance, Mr. Crocker was an invitee to the ski resort. The Supreme Court of Canada held that as an invitee: O A. Mr. Crocker was partially responsible for his own injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him no duty of care O B. Mr. Crocker was responsible for his own injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him no duty of care O C. Sundance was partially responsible for his injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him a duty of care O D. Sundance was responsible for his injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him a duty of care nuection of A Moving to another question will save this response o II C