a)% of females who took no advanced math

b) % of females who took some advanced math among those raised by fathers

c) % of females who took some advanced math among those raised by fathers and mothers

d) % offemales raised by fathers only

e)Chi-square value, df, N, and p-value in format

f) Correlation coefficient (phi or Cramer's)

g)Interpret the results. Can you reject the null hypothesis base on the p (sig) value?What is the strength of relationship between the IV and DV? Are the percentages of females who took some advanced math when raised by fathers vs. by both fathers and mothers consistent with your hypothesis? Why or why not?

Chi-Square Tests Asymptotic Significance Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.826 002 Continuity Correction 7.986 .005 Likelihood Ratio 8.434 004 Fisher's Exact Test 004 004 Linear-by-Linear 9.751 002 Association N of Valid Cases 130 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.92. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Symmetric Measures Approximate Value Significance Nominal by Nominal Phi -.275 002 Cramer's V .275 .002 N of Valid Cases 130Case Processing Summary Valid N Math classes * Parents of 130 female high school student Cases Missing Percent 0.0% Percent N 100.0% 0 N 130 Total Percent 100.0% Math classes * Parents of female high school student Crosstabulation Math classes N0 advanced math Some advanced math Total Count Expected Count '15 within Math classes 96 within Parents of female high school student Count Expected Count '16 within Math classes 96 within Parents of female high school student Count Expected Count 96 within Math classes 'it: within Parents of female high school student Primarily father 21 26.1 18.6% T0096 3.9 52.9% 30.0% 30 30.0 23.1% 100.0% Parents offemale high school student Father and mother 92 86.9 81.4% 92.0% 13.1 47.1% 8.0% 100 10010 75.9% 100.0% Total 113 113.0 100.096 86.996 17 1?.0 100.096 13.196 130 130.0 100.096 100.0%