A plaintiff who went on a summer rafting trip. Plaintiff hired a guide to take the family on a whitewater rafting trip in the Colorado Rockies. This trip also involved an overnight camping and rafting adventure through a popular stretch of the river known as Brown's Canyon. When it was time to go on the trip, she arrived at the rafting outfitter's center and met with other participants who had signed up to go whitewater rafting that day. They were all given basic guidance on what they would need to do , were handed release of liability waivers to sign. The following day, the plaintiff was on the water trying to steer around a particular hazard on the river known to locals as "Seidel's Suck Hole" when the raft was overtaken by rapids and capsized. All of the other occupants of her raft were quickly pulled to safety, but for some reason, the plaintiff was caught in a strong current and thrown into a logjam in the river. She was unable to pull herself out, and by the time help arrived, she had drowned. After her death, her son filed a wrongful death.

the question is : was the contrac void?

what tipe of contrac legality is in question?

Enable GingerCannot connect to Ginger Check your internet connection or reload the browserDisable in this text fieldRephraseRephrase current sentence6Log in to edit with Ginger