A plant patent __________.

• is available for new plant species that are asexually reproduced
• is available for new uses discovered for existing plants
• is obtainable, but not for commercial use
• is not permitted, because living things are not patentable

Which of the following most clearly represents anillegaltermination of employment?

• A delivery service manager fires a female employee after making numerous comments about how unreliable he thinks women are.
• A builder fires one of his carpenters for showing up late to work, without asking the carpenter why he was late.
• A mechanic is fired after refusing to wear the safety gear required by the shop owners.
• A waitress quits her job in the middle of a shift because the restaurant is understaffed and patrons are getting upset.

Select the statement that best applies to the new company name "Pep-C."

• This name likely cannot be trademarked.
• This name is an example of a service mark.
• This name is an example of a certification mark.
• This name is an example of a collective mark.

Ramona purchases a DVD of a copyrighted movie from a store and watches it at home with her family and a few friends.

Select the correct classification for this example.

• Fair use
• Contributory infringement
• Legal use of a copyright license
• Direct copyright infringement

If a voluntary bailment is only of benefit to the bailor, what sort of responsibility does the bailee owe the bailor?

• Ordinary duty of care
• Minimum duty of care
• The bailee has no responsibility in this case.
• Extraordinary duty of care

Russ owns a construction company and manages 10 employees. He has an extensive employee manual that clearly lays out the company's policies and expectations for its workers. The manual expressly forbids drinking alcohol during the work day. Nevertheless, one of his roofers drinks a few beers at work and ends up injuring a passerby when he throws some tools down from the roof. The injured party sues.

Is Russ liable for the tort?

• Yes, Russ is directly liable because he was the person who hired the roofer in the first place.
• No, Russ is not liable for the roofer's actions in this case because the employee manual forbade drinking on the job.
• Yes, Russ is vicariously liable according to the "zone of risk" test because the roofer was at the worksite performing his job, and his actions were foreseeable.
• No, Russ would only be liable if the injured party were another employee.