A project team member finds that the color scheme of the webpage he is designing appears too gaudy and decides to change it to a mellowed down color scheme. The independent testing team flags this as a defect and there is a heated discussion between the team member and the testing team. What is your view? A. The testing team is incorrect in flagging this as a defect. This is an example of expert judgment, wherein historical expertise is being brought into the project. B. The testing team is correct. Even though the new color scheme is more pleasing than the old one, the appropriate change management process has not been followed and the work product is not as per design. C. The testing team is not right in flagging this down. The color scheme is a simple matter and the new colors are definitely more pleasing than the old ones. D. The testing team is correct in flagging this down. The team member should have sent a note along with the work product indicating that the color scheme change had been made. Which of the following items needs to be kept in mind when relying on risk identification checklists? A. They are biased. B. They are not exhaustive. C. They are often inaccurate. D. They are easy to prepare