A study seeks to examine the effects of 4 creatine supplementation dosing strategies on anaerobic power after 4 weeksThe results from an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical test on the data from the study are as follows: Calculated F ratio =3.02 Fratio from the correct reference table (aka Critical FValue)=3.14 Assuming a significance level of 0.05, how would you interpret these results? In other words, is there a statistically significant difference between the groups? Be specific and justify your answer for full credit (2 p(3) How would your interpretation change if the calculated F ratio was 3.25 instead? Be specific and justify your answer for full credit (2pts)