A$)$ Suppose that Albert meets Belinda for lunch and the two agree, over nice sandwiches, that Albert will sell Belinda $4,000$ nectarines this year at $60$ cents per nectarine. One week later, Albert sends Belinda a signed note stating, in part $$This to confirm your purchase of $4,000$ Pacific Princess nectarines at $60$ cents per nectarine.$$ Belinda thinks about this note for $3$ weeks and then calls Albert objecting to it$,$ arguing that

$1)$ their lunch discussion was completely useless and in no way had a chance to be enforceable anyway and, besides, as an oral agreement for fruits at that price, would never be enforceable no matter what.

$2)$ She had the right to cancel anything anyway after much thought about it because of what was said in $1)$ Are either one or both of Belinda$$s claims valid? Why or why not?