A Tecator Infratec Food and Feed Analyzer instrument was used to analyze 215 samples of meat across 100 frequencies. A sample of these frequency profiles is displayed in Fig. 6.20. In addition to an IR profile, analytical chemistry determined the percent content of water, fat, and protein for each sample. If we can establish a predictive relationship between IR spectrum and fat content, then food scientists could predict a sample's fat content with IR instead of using analytical chemistry. This would provide costs savings, since analytical chemistry is a more expensive, time-consuming process a) Start R and use these commands to load the data: The matrix absorp contains the 100 absorbance values for the 215 samples, while matrix endpoints contains the percent of moisture, fat, and protein in columns 1-3, respectively. b) In this example the predictors are the measurements at the individual frequencies. Because the frequencies lie in a systematic order (8501,050nm), the predictors have a high degree of correlation. Hence, the data lie in a smaller dimension than the total number of predictors (215). Use PCA to determine the effective dimension of these data. What is the effective dimension? c) Split the data into a training and a test set the response of the percentage of moisture, pre-process the data, and build each variety of models described in this chapter. For those models with tuning parameters, what are the optimal values of the tuning parameter(s)? d) Which model has the best predictive ability? Is any model significantly better or worse than the others? e) Explain which model you would use for predicting the fat content of a sample