A type of contract where $($a$)$ one party lacks a meaningful choice to select the contract terms and $($b$)$ the contract terms

A$,$ Surprise are unreasonably favorable to the other party who did have

B$.$ Oppression the power to select the contract terms.

C$.$ Procedural Unconscionability

This type of unconscionability looks at two factors:

D$.$ Substantive Unconscionability oppression and surprise.

E$.$ Unconscionability

This type of unconscionability exists when the contract terms are overly harsh or one$-$sided.

An inequality of bargaining power which results in no real negotiation and an absence of meaningful choice.

The degree to which contract terms, which were supposedly agreed upon, are found hidden in the wordy form drafted by the party who wants to enforce the terms in dispute.