Aaron Jackson consulted Samuel Kash, a jeweler, to purchase a diamond bracelet for his wife. Kash showed Jackson a diamond bracelet in stock on sale for $$9,000.$ Jackson decided to purchase the bracelet. Kash completed and signed an appraisal form that stated the diamonds were $$H color and v$.$v$.$s$.$ quality$,$ one of the highest ratings in a jeweler$$s quality classification. One year later, another jeweler looked at the bracelet and Jackson discovered the diamonds were of substantially lower grade than v$.$v$.$s$.$ He filed a lawsuit against Kash asking for replacement with v$.$v$.$s$.$ quality diamonds or pay appropriate damages.

$1.$ Has an express warranty been made by Kash regarding the quality of the diamonds in the bracelet? Who wins? $2.$ Begin by identifying the litigants in the case $$ name Plaintiff$($s$)$ and Defendant$($s$)$ specifically.

$3.$ Determine the given facts of the case $$ only what is known, not assumed.

$4.$ Then analyze the case using the IRAC method. Be specific and detailed with each step.