Acces the following article on Sabinet :

Precedent and the constitutional court by Jason Brickhill

Link: https:/handle.net/10520/EJC28153

Question: Discuss the section "The true Motives of the Supreme Court of Appeal"

How do I answer such a question without deviating from the actual points of the court? Do I also take what is written on the article? This is a 37 marks question