According to Jeffrey Toobin, the Supreme Court's decisions in the Masterpiece Cakeshop and Trinity Lutheran demonstrate how the Court is changing the interpretation of the First Amendment. As Toobin describes it, there are two veins in this trend that are merging. First, any denial of government benefits to a church can be seen as religion discrimination, and, second, religious people can exempt themselves from obligations that are binding on all other citizens when those obligations conflict with their religious beliefs. Essentially, this allows religious people and religious institutions more ways to argue that the government has discriminated against religious beliefs, and, in turn the Court is more likely to find a violation of the . . . Group of answer choices Freedom of assembly. Establishment Clause. Freedom of association. Free Exercise Clause. Free Speech Clause