Question
According to the coming and going rule, what is the liability of the principal for injuries caused by its agents and employees while they are
According to the coming and going rule, what is the liability of the principal for injuries caused by its agents and employees while they are on their way to or from work?
Question 31 options:
complete liability | |
vicarious liability | |
limited liability | |
no liability |
Question 32 (2 points)
Sometimes, principals request that agents run errands or conduct other acts on their behalf while the agent or employee is on personal business. This is an instance of ________ for the agent.
Question 32 options:
dual-purpose mission | |
frolic and detour | |
respondeat superior | |
vicarious liability |
Question 33 (2 points)
Most jurisdictions hold ________ liable if the agent injures someone while on a dual-purpose mission.
Question 33 options:
just the agent | |
neither the principle nor the agent | |
both the principal and the agent | |
just the principle |
Question 34 (2 points)
Jamie is a lawyer who runs her own law firm and specializes in real estate law. Raymond, a real estate developer, hires Jamie to represent him in the purchase of land. Jamie is the:
Question 34 options:
principal | |
independent contractor | |
employee | |
third-party |
Question 35 (2 points)
Business Unlimited Corporation employs Harriet as its marketing manager. Harriet is driving her automobile to attend a meeting with a client on behalf of her employer. On her way to the meeting, Harriet negligently causes an automobile accident that seriously injures several people. Which of the following is an accurate statement regarding liability to the injured parties?
Question 35 options:
Harriet is not liable, as she was acting within the course and scope of her employment at the time of the accident. | |
Business Unlimited Corporation is not liable, since the accident did not occur on company property. | |
Harriet is personally liable to the injured parties, and Business Unlimited Corporation is also liable because Harriet was acting within the scope of her employment when the accident occurred. | |
Harriet is personally liable to the injured parties but Business Unlimited Corporation is not, as they did not control Harriet's actions at the time of the accident. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started