According to the ruling in Appleby v.Erie Tobacco.Co, why is the Intent of the defendant Irrelevant to establishing that a nuisance exists? Why is an Injunction the appropriate remedy according to the court in Appleby? What, according to Justice Cote's ruling In Moore v Sweet, does a plaintiff. need to establish to succeed In unjust enrichment? Why, on Justice Cote's account, Is Risa unable to present a residual.legal reason for denying Michelle compensation? In what sense,. according to the ruling In Wilkinson v Downton, were the actions of the defendant intended to harm the plaintiff?