According to this article, https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/21/politics/supreme-court-john-roberts-trump/index.html and picture attached below,

make an argument that judges make decisions on bases other than their political affiliations. Cite at least 2 specific quotes or facts from the videos or newspaper articles

U.D. DICWS. l'lU UUdllld U1 1 1u111p JUUQCS 11.616, Appointees of Both Declare Bravin, Jess . Wall Street Journal , Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 16 Sep 2019: A3. Pro Quest document link FULL TEXT WILLIAMSBUFIG, Va. - Federal judges including potential Supreme Court pick Amy Coney Barrett bemoaned a partisan political environment that has seen President Trump and some others label them as extensions of the presidents who appointed them. In comments Saturday at a panel at William &Mary Law School, Judge Ban'ett backed Chief Justice John Floberts's public statement last year that judges shouldn't be seen as ideological mirrors of their patrons, which came after President Trump called a ruling that he opposed on immigration the product of an "Obama judge." 'The chiefjustice, I think, articulated what members of the judiciary feel," Judge Barrett said of his comments to Mr. Trump. "The chiefjustice responded and pushed back and said, 'You know, we don't have Obama judges.\" In the November 2018 statement issued by the court, Chief Justice Roberts said: "We do not have Obama judges or Trumpjudges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them." Mr. Trump then rejected the chief justice's position, tweeting "Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have 'Obama judges.\" Mr. Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (FL, Ky.) have made a priority of filing the federal bench with conservative appointees, and Mr. Trump has embraced the issue as a central point of his reelection bid. 0n the Supreme Court, Mr. Trump's two conservative picks have tilted the balance to the right, highlighting the importance of the president in determining the federal courts' makeup and the future course of the law. "Historic Milestone indeed!" the president tweeted Friday, along with an article noting he has filled 150 judgeships. Three other federal circuit judges on the panel Saturday, all either Trump or Obama appointees, joined Judge Barrett in rejecting partisan characterizations of the judiciary, also criticizing news reports that emphasize which president picked a judge for the bench. "We certainly are not viewing ourselves as members of teams or camps or parties. It's a very frustrating thing about the way the media portray us," said Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the US. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Philadelphia. "My boss is not my chiefjudge. My boss is not my appointing president, my boss is the Constitution and the laws," he said. "We will interpret the law somewhat differently. And we have different legitimate understandings of how to do that. But none of us would have taken this job if we wanted to be legislators," said Judge Bibas, a former law professor at the University of Pennsylvania. "We really aren't thinking, 'I'm here to do the bidding of the party of the president that put me here,' " said Judge Comelia Pillard, an Obama appointee to the District of Columbia Circuit. "One of the things that really feels threatening, and frustrating -- although I understand why -- is how much what the public hears through the press is about the partisan lineups" on the courts. 'We really aren't thinking, 'I'm here to do the bidding of the party of the president that put me here,' " said Judge Cornelia Pillard, an Obama appointee to the District of Columbia Circuit. "One of the things that really feels threatening, and frustrating -- although I understand why -- is how much what the public hears through the press is about the partisan lineups" on the courts. The moderator, William &Mary law professor Allison Orr Larsen, asked the judges what they perceived as the greatest threat to the judiciary. Judge Barrett said it was "people perceiving us as partisan." While judges differ in their legal theories and methods - and their votes sometimes can be predicted along ideological lines -- they aren't driven to produce specific ProQuest PDF GENERATED BY PROQUEST.COM Page 1 of 3 outcomes, she said. Judge Barrett, a University of Notre Dame law professor before Mr. Trump appointed her to the Chicago-based Seventh Circuit in 2017, is a favorite of social conservatives who was considered for the Supreme Court vacancy that went to Justice Brett Kavanaugh. She has been suggested as a particularly serious contender should Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, age 86, or another female justice step down during Mr. Trump's term. "I don't really understand why it is that people want so badly to put us on teams," said Judge Kevin Newsom, a Trump appointee to the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit. "You know, my Democratically-appointed colleagues on the 11th circuit, I love them, and I think they love me, and lots of times we see eye to eye. And when we don't, we're all still friends," he said. Credit: By Jess Bravin