AD-209-U04-Business Law-30201.202030 pard / My courses / BUAD-209-004-30201.202030 / Sections / Midterm / Midterm 2 - Part 3 on 1 Mr. Wong purchased a 2015 car from the defendant Mr. Yang for the price of $15,000. During a test drive with Mr. Yang before purchasing the vehicle, Mr. Wong noticed ed that the odometer indicated a reading of 46,000 "mi" and when he asked the defendant about it, the defendant told him that notwithstanding the symbols "mi" on the d out of odometer, the vehicle had 46,000 kilometers on it. Mr. Wong said that despite the fact that the odometer read in miles he simply accepted the Defendant's assertion that the recorded distance was, in fact, in kilometers, even though he was aware that the symbol for kilometers was "km" and not "mi". After buying the vehicle, Mr. Wong learned that 46,000 miles was in fact 74,000 kilometers. Evidence of a car dealer indicated that this vehicle with 74,000 kilometer distance on it was valued at $12,000.00 Canadian dollars whereas it would be worth $15,000.00 if the distance was only 46,000 kilometers. Mr. Wong is suing Mr. Yang for the price difference of $3000 on the basis that the Defendant misrepresented the Vehicle's odometer reading to him and that, as a result, he paid too much for the Vehicle. 1. What is (are) the legal issue(s)? (2 marks) 2. What is the legal test (rule of law) used by the courts? (1 mark) 3. Create an argument for the Plaintiff (1 mark) 4. Create an argument for the Defendant (1 mark) FFY 1 B