Address BOTH positives (strengths) and negatives (weaknesses) of the study Don't just be a pessimist The sky isn't always dark and gloomy Also, don't just be an optimist The world isn't just about puppies and rainbows ) You do not necessarily have to address every question I have outlined below (Reference the Grading Rubric to see how many questions need to be answered) Use them as food for thought If your critique is running a little long, pick and choose which questions you want to address However, it would be in your best interest to address the article as a WHOLE, meaning critique all sections of the article Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion Conclusion Introduction How understandable did they make the variables they wanted to study What were the variables studied How well did they explain, reason, and rationalize their theory and hypothesis What were the hypothesis hypotheses of the study How well did they describe the importance of their study Methods What was the sample and how representative was their sample to the population Did their methods make sense based on the variables they wanted to study How did they measure and operationalize their variables How well did they measure and operationalize their variables Did they use case study, surveys, naturalistic observation, etc Did they take into account the limitations of each of these How realistic was their method to real life (Remember though, that no study can perfectly replicate real life it is all about how close you can get to it) How valid and reliable were their methods Results Don't worry about understanding the statistics What were the findings and how generalizable or applicable were the findings to real life Did the researchers make reasonable claims from their study Did they over generalize their claims Discussion Conclusion All studies have flaws How well did the researchers address the limitations and weaknesses of their study (at least1 limitation needs to be discussed) How well did the researchers talk about implications of their findings and future directions (atleast1strength implication needs to be discussed)

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on May 20, 2024

*Address BOTH positives (strengths) and negatives (weaknesses) of the study. Don't just be a pessimist. The sky isn't always dark and gloomy. Also, don't just

*Address BOTH positives (strengths) and negatives (weaknesses) of the study. Don't just be a pessimist. The sky isn't always dark and gloomy. Also, don't just be an optimist. The world isn't just about puppies and rainbows ;) *You do not necessarily have to address every question I have outlined below (Reference the Grading Rubric to see how many questions need to be answered). Use them as food for thought. If your critique is running a little long, pick and choose which questions you want to address.However, it would be in your best interest to address the article as a WHOLE, meaning critique all sections of the article: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion/Conclusion

Introduction

- How understandable did they make the variables they wanted to study? What were the variables studied?
- How well did they explain, reason, and rationalize their theory and hypothesis? What were the hypothesis/hypotheses of the study?
- How well did they describe the importance of their study?

Methods

- What was the sample and how representative was their sample to the population?
- Did their methods make sense based on the variables they wanted to study?
- How did they measure and operationalize their variables?How well did they measure and operationalize their variables?
  - Did they use case study, surveys, naturalistic observation, etc.?
    - Did they take into account the limitations of each of these?
- How realistic was their method to real life (Remember though, that no study can perfectly replicate real life... it is all about how close you can get to it)?
- How valid and reliable were their methods?

Results

- Don't worry about understanding the statistics.
- What were the findings and how generalizable or applicable were the findings to real life?
- Did the researchers make reasonable claims from their study?
  - Did they over-generalize their claims?

Discussion/Conclusion

- All studies have flaws! How well did the researchers address the limitations and weaknesses of their study (at least1 limitation needs to be discussed)?
- How well did the researchers talk about implications of their findings and future directions (atleast1strength/implication needs to be discussed)?