Afer Philios notiied Hooters that she intended to After Phillips notified Hooters that she intended to Tile suit for sexual harassment and employment dis- crimination, Hooters filed suit to compel arbitration compel arbitration. 1. Who prevails and why? 2. Why do you think that Hooters cho chose to include The district court ruled in favor of Phian vod contractsins been P that the arbitration clause was unenforceable and void contracts because it was not a true meeting of the minds required 3. HadP for an enforceable agreement between the parties an that the clause was void as a matter of public policy.change your ld ips and held mandatory arbitration clause in Phillips been provided a copy of the rulcs she signed the employment contract, wout Hooters appealed analysis? Why or why nor? ld thi au 105 S.W.3d 190