After inheriting a large sum of money Larry decided to indulge his passion forswimming and entered into a contract with Swimming Pools R US to construct an outdoor swimmingpool in the garden of his house. The pool was to be 50 feet long by 15 feet wide by 6 feet deep, and was to becleaned by a special non-chlorine based filter system. The pool was due to be finished inMarch and Larry entered into another contract with Colin to landscape hisgarden starting on 1 May. Pools R US finished the pool on 15 March. However, when Larry came to try it for thefirst time he found that it was only 5 feet deep. In addition, Pools R US had notinstalled the non-chlorine filter system but had instead used an ordinary chlorine basedsystem. As a result, Larry, who unknown to Pools R US was highly allergic to chlorine,suffered a severe reaction and had to take a week off his work and as a result lost apotentially lucrative contract. On 1 April, Colin informed Larry that he was too busy to do his garden and thathe would have to get someone else to do it. The only person available, however, willcharge Larry $1000 more than Colin agreed for doing the work. Discussion: Analyze the scenario from the perspective of the law of contract, advising Larry: (a) Whether he can require Pools R US to reconstruct the swimming pool in order to make it theagreed depth, and if not, what alternative action is available to him? (b) What, if any, action can he take against Pools R US as a consequence of their failure to fitthe chlorine free filter? (c) Whether he can require Colin to undertake the work on the garden, and if not, whatalternative action is available to him