After numerous campus interviews, Jeff Hunter, a senior at Great Northern College, received two office interview invitations from the Baltimore offices of two large firms. Both firms offered to cover his out-of-pocket expenses (travel, hotel, and meals). He scheduled the interviews for both firms on the same day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. At the conclusion of each interview, he submitted to both firms his total out-of-pocket expenses for the trip to Baltimore: mileage $112 (280 miles at $0.40 ), hotel $130, meals $36, parking and tolls $18, for a total of $296. He believes this approach is appropriate. If he had made two trips, his cost would have been two times $296. He is also certain that neither firm knew he had visited the other on that same trip. Within 10 days, Jeff received two checks in the mail, each in the amount of \$296. Given the foregoing ethical issue, please respond to the following: 1. Identify the ethical issue(s) noted in the reading above. 2. Who are the stakeholders in this situation? 3. What alternative courses of action could Jeff Hunter take? List some alternative courses of action and briefly describe how each one will affect the stakeholders that you identified in question \#2 (above). 4. Which course of action would you choose and why