after reading below article, analyse and review it. the article is:

The Bright-Side and the Dark-Side of CEO Personality: Examining Core Self-Evaluations, Narcissism, Transformational Leadership, and Strategic Influence

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38092549_The_Bright-Side_and_the_Dark-Side_of_CEO_Personality_Examining_Core_Self-Evaluations_Narcissism_Transformational_Leadership_and_Strategic_Influence

Christian J. Resick Drexel University Daniel S. Whitman Florida International University and University of Bridgeport Steven M. Weingarden Thinking Ahead, LLC Nathan J. Hiller Florida International University

This article reports on an examination of the relationships between chief executive officer (CEO) personality, transformational and transactional leadership, and multiple strategic outcomes in a sample of 75 CEOs of Major League Baseball organizations over a 100-year period. CEO bright-side personality characteristics (core self-evaluations) were positively related to transformational leadership, whereas dark-side personality characteristics (narcissism) of CEOs were negatively related to contingent reward leadership. In turn, CEO transformational and contingent reward leadership were related to 4 different strategic outcomes, including manager turnover, team winning percentage, fan attendance, and an independent rating of influence. CEO transformational leadership was positively related to ratings of influence, team winning percentage, and fan attendance, whereas contingent reward leadership was negatively related to manager turnover and ratings of influence. Keywords: core self-evaluations, leadership, narcissism, transformational leadership.

The following isrequired inrelation to theassignedcase study

1. Discuss the research gaps identified in the article and how they relate to the research aims, objectives, or questions. Use both analytical and creative thinking to propose an additional research gap that could enhance the body of knowledge if explored. CLO 1-5points
2. Analyze the extended theories presented in the article, providing relevant examples, and connect them to the conceptual framework developed in the paper (if no framework is provided, create one for your critique). Additionally, suggest two theories that could effectively complement this paper. CLO2-5 points.
3. Determine whether the paper clearly and adequately outlines the relationships between various variables (independent, dependent, control, and intervening variables) through the conceptual framework. Recommend the inclusion of a new variable for future research. If the paper is qualitative or conceptual, propose and illustrate a framework indicating hypothetical relationships between variables.CLO 2- 5 points.
4. Evaluate the research design and methodology used in the study, focusing on instruments and their reliability (Cronbach's alpha), population and sampling design/technique, response rate (if applicable), and data analysis methods. Suggest an alternative methodology that could have been used for this research.CLO 1- 5 points.

please don't forget referencing