Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

After reading prompt below, why would a Silicon Valley firm such asGoogle, support Impression Products? Explain, with reasons please. A patent holder that restricts the

After reading prompt below, why would a Silicon Valley firm such asGoogle, support Impression Products? Explain, with reasons please.

A patent holder that restricts the reuse or resale of its printer ink cartridges can't invoke patent law against a remanufacturing company that violates the restriction, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday.

The court ruled that Lexmark International's patent rights are exhausted with its first sale of the cartridges, despite restrictions it tried to impose.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote theopinion(PDF), joined in full by six justices. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch didn't participate in the case.

The court ruled in Lexmark's infringement suit against Impression Products for refurbishing and reselling Lexmark cartridges.

Lexmark tried to prevent third parties from acquiring, refurbishing and reselling its used cartridges by creating a "return program." Customers who bought cartridges and agreed to return them got 20 percent off their cost. To prevent customers from reselling the cartridges to others, Lexmark installed a microchip that prevents reuse.

Companies such as Impression Products had developed methods to counteract the microchip, enabling it to refurbish Lexmark cartridges and undercut the Lexmark new-sale price.

Lexmark's contracts with customers may have been enforceable under contract law, but the company did not retain patent rights after sale of the cartridges, Roberts said.

"We conclude that a patentee's decision to sell a product exhausts all of its patent rights in that item, regardless of any restrictions the patentee purports to impose or the location of the sale," Roberts wrote.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred with Roberts' conclusions regarding patent exhaustion for domestic sales of the cartridges. But she would have held that Lexmark's patent is not exhausted for foreign sales.

The decision inImpression Products v. Lexmark Internationaltakes away an important tool used by companies to control the marketplace,Bloomberg Newsreports.

Biotechnology, drug and agricultural industries had supported Lexmark, while Silicon Valley companies such as Google had supported Impression Products. Sellers of refurbished auto parts and medical devices also supported exhaustion of the patent.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Employment Law For Business

Authors: Dawn Bennett Alexander, Laura P Hartman

6th Edition

978-0073377636, 73377635, 978-0077347383

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions