After reading the case In re Guaranty Insurance Services, Inc., 310 S.W.3d 630,

1. What are the facts of the case?

2. What is the main issue in the case?

3.Compare and contrast the majority and dissenting opinions. What basis does each claim the case should be based on? Why?

4. Examine different contexts for this same ruling. Would the opinion be different if the facts were changed? How?

5. What implications does this ruling have on future cases? If you disagree with the majority, what can be done about this? Does this ruling have any implications to you personally or to society in general?