After reading the Northrop and Sadoff (2013) article, summarize and discuss the decisions made regarding confidentiality and disclosure in forensic evaluations. In your main post, be sure to address the following:

• What are the main facts of the case?
• What were the major findings and rulings?
• What were Chief Justice Kilbride's main reasons for dissenting?
• What are the differences between your personal reaction to the case, the role of the APA Ethics code, and the court ruling.
• How does the court's ruling compare/contrast with the APA Ethics Code? Consider the specific General Principles and Ethical Standards that relate.
• Do you agree with the court's ruling? Why or why not?