Question
Al Hansen, the newly appointed vice presiden t of fin an ce of Berksh ire Instruments, was eager to talk to his investment banker about
Al Hansen, the newly appointed vice presiden t of fin an ce of Berksh ire Instruments, was eager to talk to his investment banker about future financingfor the firm. One of Al's first assignments was to determine the firm's cost of capital.In assessing the weights to use in computing the cost of capital, he examined the current balance sheet, presented in Figure 1.
In their discussion, Al and his investment banker determined that the current mix in the capital structure was very close to optimal and that Berkshire Instruments should continue with it in the future. Of some concern was the appropriat e cost t o assign t o each of the elem en t s in t he capit al st ructure. Al Hansen requ est ed t h at h is adm in ist rative assistant provide data on what the cost to issue debt and preferred stock had been in the past. The information is provided in Figure 2.
When Al got the data, he felt he was m akin g real progress t oward det erm ining the cost of capital for the firm. However, his investment banker indicated that he was goin g abou t t h e process in an in correct manner. The important issue is the current cost of funds, not the historical cost. The
ban ker su ggest ed t h at a com parable firm in the industry, in terms of size and bond rating (Baa), Rollins Instruments, had issued bonds a year and a half ago for 9.3 percent interest at a $1,000 par value, and the bonds were currently selling for $890. The bonds had 20 years remaining to maturity. The banker also observed that Rollins Instruments had just issued preferred st ock at $60 per sh are, an d the preferred st ock paid an an n u al dividend of $4.80.
In terms of cost of common equity, the banker suggested that Al Hansen use the dividen d valu at ion m odel as a first approach t o det erm in in g cost of equity. Based on t h at approach , Al observed that earnings were $3 a share and that 40 percen t wou ld be paid ou t in dividen ds (D1). Th e cu rren t st ock price was $25. Dividends in the last four years had grown from 82 cents to the current value.
The banker indicated that the under- writ in g cost (flot at ion cost ) on a preferred stock issue would be $2.60 per share and $2.00 per share on common stock. Al Hansen further observed that his firm was in a 35 percent marginal tax bracket.
CASE STUDY 3
Berkshire Instruments
Figure 1
BERKSHIRE INSTRUMENTS Statement of Financial Position December 31, 2015
With all this information in hand, Al Hansen sat down to determine his firm'scost of capital. He was a little confused about computing the firm's cost of commonequity. He knew there were two different formulas: one for the cost of retained earnings and one for the cost of new common stock. His investment banker suggested that he follow the normally accepted approach used in determining the marginal cost of capital. First, determine the cost of capital for as large a capital structure as current retained earnings will support; then, determine the cost of capital based on exclusively using new common stock.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started