Alexander was a brilliant inventor who worked for Glanto. Alexander received a story of $90,000 a year, but also invented several products for GlantCo which made them in excess of $10 billion in profits in the five years he had worked for them. Alexander was dissatisfied with his salary and wanted a bonus based on the massive amount of money he made GiantCo, but they turned down his request and paid him only one dollar more than his bese salary because he had signed an employment contract which called for him to give up all rights to inventions in consideration of St Bill thinks this sunfair and has sued. What will be the likely court resul? Multiple Choice GiantCo wins because the Stagreement for the rights to inventions was past consideration and thus nat enforceable. Alexander wins because $1 is inadequate consideration for 510 billion in profits. Alexander wins because there was no mutual assent in the contract. GlantCo wins because this was a bargained-for exchange and consideration need not be of equal value