Alice is a software engineer at a well$-$known high tech company. She is part of a team developing a social media application. The application includes a feature that analyzes user data to personalize content and advertisements. During development, Alice discovers that the data collection process is much more invasive than what is disclosed in the privacy policy. The app collects not only user interactions but also background data such as location, microphone usage, and access to personal contacts.Alice raises her concerns with her manager, pointing out that the current practice violates users' privacy and is not transparently communicated to them. However, her manager dismisses her concerns, stating that the extensive data collection is crucial for the companys revenue model and user engagement metrics. He also suggests that being fully transparent could lead to users opting out, which would negatively impact the business.Faced with this ethical dilemma, Alice is torn between following her managers directives and her own moral compass. She contemplates whether to escalate the issue, inform the users, or even resign from her position.Evaluate the ethical implications of Alice's situation using the following ethical frameworks:$1.$Kantianism: Analyze whether Alices decision should be guided by the principle of respecting users' autonomy and treating them as ends in themselves, not merely as means to an end.