all 3 please!

There is an urban iegend that modern tabies or oecomposinder the the amount of preservatives we have in our food these dnys. The befief being that the more preservatives in the body the longer is takes to decay. Below is a toble of cxperimental data that measured the standard namber of hours required to rexch each sase of human decay based on the mss percent of preservative found in the body. Based en your analysis of the data in the table, is there any valdity to the statement made by the "urban legend?? Yes or No Which of the following statements best describes your asuersment of the data above? While some of the data seems to indicate an increase in the amount of time to rexch the various states of decay, the values are not al consistent and therefore do not provide enough evidence to state that the "urban legend" has some valdity. More Sudy should be conducted to corfirm the trends. Because the data indicates that with some increase of presenabie there is an actial decrease in the time of decay, there does not appear to be any direct/incar comejation between the percentage of preservaitive and the decay rate. There is no. valdity to the seatement made ty the ruban iepend? While soene of the data seems inconsitent on the whole the time of decay does increase with increases ameunts of preservabive so there is some valdity in the satement made by the "urban iesend? Question 19 Body Temoenature is often given as 370 des Cetsis What is this tnroense in Ketvint k=c+27315 NOTE: PLFASE DUT THE AHSWER IN THE CORsECT NuMeER OF 9CNIFICANT HicUPE