All information is provided below. Complete problem and data that needs to be used in order to solve.

The International League of Triple-A minor league baseball consists of 14 teams organized into three divisions: North, South, and West. The data showing the average attendance for the 14 teams in the International League are contained in the Excel Online file below. Also shown are the teams' records; W denotes the number of games won, L denotes the number of games lost, and PCT is the proportion of games played that were won. Construct a spreadsheet to answer the following questions. Due to a recent change by Microsoft you will need to open the XLMiner Analysis ToolPak add-in manually from the home ribbon. Screenshot of ToolPak X # Open spreadsheet a. Use a =.06 to test for any difference in the mean attendance for the three divisions. Calculate the value of the F-statistic (to 2 decimals). The p-value is (to 4 decimals). What is your conclusion? There is | sufficient :@ evidence to conclude that the mean attendance values are not the same across the three divisions of the International League of Triple-A minor league baseball. b. Use Fisher's LSD procedure to test whether there is a significant difference between the means for North (1), South (2), and West (3). Use a = .06. Absolute Value LSD (to 2 (to 2 Difference decimals) decimals) Conclusion Significant difference No significant difference # Significant differenceU V K M N 0 Q R S T B C D E G Team Name Division W L PCT Attendance Part a. Rearrange the Attendance values for the Anova: Single-Factor Analysis Buffalo Bisons North 66 77 0.462 B838 Lehigh Valley IronPigs North 55 89 0.382 8464 North South West Pawtucket Red Sox North 85 58 0.59 9100 Rochester Red Wings North 80 70 0.533 6908 Scranton-Wilkes Barre Yankees North 8.8 56 0.611 7123 Syracuse Chiefs North 69 72 0.489 5772 Charlotte Knights South 66 78 0.458 4531 Durham Bulls South 74 70 0.514 7021 Norfolk Tides South 64 78 0.451 3258 Richmond Braves South 63 87 0.42 4447 Columbus Clippers West 69 73 0.486 7776 After reading these instructions delete all text in this shaded area. Indianapolis Indians Nest 68 76 0.472 8535 Louisville Bats West 90 56 0.616 9182 Use the XLMiner Analysis ToolPak to conduct your Anova: Single Factor analysis. Toledo Mud Hens West 75 69 0.521 8212 After deleting all text in this shaded area, set the output range in the ToolPak to the top left cell of this area (H16). Your Anova analysis output should fit into this shaded area. Part b Significance Level (Alpha) 0.05 Formula #N/A Critical t-value Fisher's LSD Procedure: Conclusion Absolute Value LSD Conclusion Absolute Value LSD (Enter "Significant difference" or "No significant difference" North-South #N/A #NIA INA North-South #N/A North-West North-West #N/A ENIA South-West #NIA #N/A #N/A South-WestThe International League of Triple-A minor league baseball consists of 14 teams organized into three divisions: North, South, and West. The data showing the average attendance for the 14 teams in the International League are contained in the Excel Online file below. Also shown are the teams' records; W denotes the number of games won, L denotes the number of games lost, and PCT is the proportion of games played that were won. Construct a spreadsheet to answer the following questions. Due to a recent change by Microsoft you will need to open the XLMiner Analysis ToolPak add-in manually from the home ribbon. Screenshot of ToolPak X Open spreadsheet a. Use a =.06 to test for any difference in the mean attendance for the three divisions. Calculate the value of the F-statistic (to 2 decimals). 12.06 The p-value is 0.0017 (to 4 decimals). What is your conclusion? There is | sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean attendance values are not the same across the three divisions of the International League of Triple- A minor league baseball. b. Use Fisher's LSD procedure to test whether there is a significant difference between the means for North (1), South (2), and West (3). Use a = .06. Absolute Value LSD (to 2 (to 2 Difference decimals) decimals) Conclusion Significant difference No significant difference # Significant difference #