All of the following statements about the POM Wonderful, LLC v. FTC case are true, except: That the medical studies conducted by POM Wonderful concluded that any health benefit of pomegranate juice was at best slight and obtained only in studies that were scientifically invalid. That POM Wonderful included a disclaimer on its products that adequately warned consumers of the limitations of the products' supporting research. That, despite spending $35 million on research, POM Wonderful failed to conduct any randomized and controlled human clinical trials (RCTs) on its products. That Pom Wonderful's ads' references to its medical studies as "promising" "initial" or "preliminary" did not neutralize the claims POM made that its juice can treat, prevent or reduce the risk of prostate cancer and hear disease. Tom loves classic rock music. Late one night as he was listening to his Bad Company cassette on full blast, he saw an infomercial on TV advertising a series of classic rock band CDs at low prices. Tom turned down his music, picked up his phone and called the number on the screen. Tom ordered two CDs (Pink Floyd and the Grateful Dead) for $5 each. He gave the salesperson his credit card number and authorized the purchase of the CDs. Three days later, Tom received the CDs. The next month, Tom received another CD in the mail (Fog Hat's Greatest Hits), along with a receipt of payment for $25. Tom was upset since he did not authorize the company to charge his credit card a second time, nor did he order the Fog Hat CD. Under FTC rules on unordered merchandise, Tom may treat the unordered CD as a gift and keep it without paying for it. True False