All relevant information is there :)

Question 1 Not yet saved Marked out of 1.00 15' Flag question Question 2 Not yet saved Marked out of 1.00 'E' Flag question Question 3 Not yet saved Marked out of 1.00 'F' Flag question To establish the defence of mental illness in NSW, the accused must prove a defect of reason caused by a disease of the mind. In addition. the accused must prove either that he or she did not know the nature and quality of the act he or she was doing, or that he or she did not know that what he or she was doing was 'wrong'. Wrong is defined in common law as meaning... Select one: D a. Wrong having regard to the everyday standards of reasonable people O b. Wrong having regard to the everyday standards of reasonable people and known by the accused to be wrong by the standards of everyday people O c. Unlawful G d. Wrong according to a sane reasonable person In Moore v The Queen {20161262 A Crim R 590. why was lv'loore's appeal upheld? He had been found guilty of an offence against 5 192E {1]I{b] of the Crimes Act 1900 {NSW} Select one: D a. Because there was no deception O b. Because he had not behaved dishonestly O c. Because he had not obtained a financial advantage G d. Because there was no causal connection between the deception and obtaining a nancial advantage Which is incorrect? Select one: Q a. If an accused is found not guilty on the basis of sane automatismr he or she is entitled to a complete acquittal O b. Sane automatism is relevant to voluntariness and insane automatism is relevant to the defence of mental illness O c. If an accused is found not guilty on the basis of insane automatismr he or she is likely to be subject to preventive detention G d. Sane automatism arises from a disease of the mind