Question
Alpine Roofing Company, an audit client of Marques, CPA, manufactures two products: tar shingles and aluminum gutters. In examining Alpines Reserve for Warranty Guarantees as
Alpine Roofing Company, an audit client of Marques, CPA, manufactures two products: tar shingles and aluminum gutters. In examining Alpines Reserve for Warranty Guarantees as of December 31, 2007that is, the estimated liability for warranty repairs and allowances resulting from 2007 salesMarques reviews internal quality control and engineering reports and learns the following:
Alpine processes approximately 75 sales orders per business day for tar shingles and 25 orders per day for aluminum gutters.
Warranty repairs and allowances are claimed on about 20 percent of the recorded sales orders for shingles and on 10 percent of the sales for gutters, both of which are of concern to management.
Because sales were unusually high in October and more than 25 percent warranty claims for either product could prove damaging to Alpines reputation, management asks Marques which product, shingles or gutters, is more likely to have more than 25 percent warranty claims resulting from October sales. Marques concludes that tar shingles are more likely to have more than 25 percent claims because shingle sales outperformed gutter sales 3 to 1 in October, just as in the daily estimates.
Required:
1. Which of the cognitive heuristicsrepresentativeness, availability, or anchoringmay have caused bias in Marques response? Explain.
2. Is Marques correct? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started