Alternative dividend policies Over the last 10 years, a firm has had the earnings per share shown in the following table: a.If the firm's dividend policy were based on a constant payout ratio of 40% for all years with positive earnings and 0% otherwise, what would be the annual dividend for 2016?

b.If the firm had a dividend payout of $1.00 per share, increasing by $0.10 per share whenever the dividend payout fell below 50% for two consecutive years, what annual dividend would the firm pay in 2016?

c.If the firm's policy were to pay $0.50 per share each period except when earnings per share exceed $3.00, when an extra dividend equal to 80% of earnings beyond $3.00 would be paid, what annual dividend would the firm pay in 2016?

d.Discuss the pros and cons of each dividend policy described in parts a through c.

u poily escribed in parts a through c. a. If the firm's dividend policy were based on a constant payout ratio of 40% for all years with positive earnings and otherwise, the annual dividend for 2016 is Sl (Round to the nearest cent.) u poily escribed in parts a through c. a. If the firm's dividend policy were based on a constant payout ratio of 40% for all years with positive earnings and otherwise, the annual dividend for 2016 is Sl (Round to the nearest cent.)