Question
[Amdahl was an optimist] In practice, applying an optimization to one part of a codebase can require overheads that did not exist in the original
[Amdahl was an optimist]
In practice, applying an optimization to one part
of a codebase can require overheads that did not exist in the original
execution or even have negative impacts on logically unrelated portions of
the code. Consider an
already parallel
code whose execution consists of
SERIAL (S), PARALLEL-COMPUTE (PC), and PARALLEL-SYNC (PS) regions,
where, with 1 thread, S=20%, PC=75%, and PS=5% of execution time.
Assume that the amount of execution required for PS grows linearly with the
number of threads, but is itself 80% parallelizable, and that PC receives a 1:1
linear speedup with the number of threads. Find
1) the number of threads that maximizes the performance of this code, and
2) the speedup of a 100% parallelizable PS over 1) for the same number of
threads that maximizes the performance of 1).
(note no knowledge of parallel threading or synchronization is required to
solve this problem it is a direct application of Amdahls law)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started