Amold is a city worker performing work on a sidewalk in Downtown Vancouver. He is digging a hole to reach a utility line. The hole is four feet wide, four feet long, and four feet deep. When he is done digging, he secures the area with two orange cones at the corners facing the sidewalk. The cones are one foot tall. There is three feet of sidewalk left for pedestrians. The next morning, shortly after sunrise, Sylvester walks past the hole on his way to work shortly after sunrise. Just as he passes it on a busy morning, his right leg hits the edge of the hole, which causes him to lose balance and fall into the hole. He breaks his right arm as a result and is taken to the hospital. Sylvester has sued Arnold's employer, the City of Vancouver, for damages. He wants compensation for both the broken arm and the broken leg. Plaintiff's Lawyers The plaintiff is Sylvester Stallone He is arguing that the City, through Arnold, was negligent Sylvester wants compensation for both the broken arm Make the best case possible for Sylvester, applying the relevant law to the facts Defendant's Lawyers The defendant is the City of Vancouver It argues that Arnold was not negligent Make the best case possible for the City, applying the relevant law to the facts Judges Consider the arguments made by both sides and decide which one is better and why Make sure to base your view on the relevant law and the facts of the case Make sure you don't spend much time discussing the plaintiff and defendant's submissions and instead focus on your own views (short references to the parties' submissions are sufficient)