Amy's situation raises questions about the fairness of the contract she entered into with High Note for the Alpo Theater Model XL2. The concept of unconscionability revolves around contracts that are so one-sided or worrying that they shock the conscience and are deemed unenforceable by the courts. Several factors are typically considered when determining unconscionability, including the relative bargaining power of the parties, the presence of unfair terms, and whether the contract's terms are commercially reasonable. In Amy's case, there are elements that suggest the contract could be considered unconscionable. First, she is a 20-year-old college student, likely lacking in experience and bargaining power compared to a large electronics store like High Note. This power imbalance may have influenced her decision-making process. The terms of the contract appear to heavily favor High Note. The total amount Amy would pay under the lease-to-own agreement ($25 a week for 100 weeks plus a final payment of $500) amounts to $3000, significantly higher than the $1000 price tag she saw at the other store. This discrepancy raises concerns about the fairness of the pricing terms. Amy's inability to shop around before signing the contract suggests that she may have been pressured into agreeing to unfavorable terms without fully understanding her options. It's essential to consider the counterargument that Amy willingly signed the contract without coercion, and the terms were disclosed to