Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

An article from the American Journal of Public Health 2 reports the results from a randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention

An article from the American Journal of Public Health 2 reports the results from a randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention targeted to young African American men who had tested positive for a sexual transmitted infection (STI) at a large urban health clinic. A representative sample of 266 men was randomized to be in either the intervention group (n=141) or the control group (n=125). The primary outcome under study was reinfection, defined as testing positive for another STI during the 3-month follow-up period. At the end of the study, 45 of the 141 subjects in the intervention group were reinfected with a STI, as compared to 63 of the 125 subjects in the control group. 17. What is the estimated relative risk of STI reinfection for subjects in the Intervention group compared to subjects in the Control group? a. 0.19 b. 0.63 c. 1.58 d. -0.19 18. The estimated risk difference for reinfection within 3 months is -0.185 (-18.5%) for the intervention group compared to the control group. How could you explain to the health commissioner of city with an estimated 1,000 STI infected African American young men? a. If the intervention was given there would be an estimated 185 fewer STI reinfections (over 3 months) than if the intervention was not given. b. If the intervention was given there would be an estimated 185 more STI reinfections (over 3 months) than if the intervention was not given. c. Each participant in the intervention program would reduce his personal risk of reinfection (over 3 months) by a factor of 0.185 relative to his personal risk of reinfection if he did not participate in the intervention program. d. Each participant in the intervention program would increase his personal risk of reinfection (over 3 months) a factor of 1.185 relative to his personal risk of reinfection if he did not participate in the intervention program. e. There is no way to explain this because risk differences cannot be negative. 2 Crosby R, et al. A Brief, Clinic-Based, Safer Sex Intervention for Heterosexual African American Men Newly Diagnosed With an STD: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The American Journal of Public Health. (2009). Vol 99, No S1. 11 19. A chi-squared test was performed using these results. The resulting p-value was less than 0.01. Which of the following 95% confidence intervals for the relative risk of reinfection for subjects randomized to the Intervention group compared to subjects randomized to the control group is consistent with this p-value, and with the result from question 17? a. 1.17 to 2.12 b. -0.30 to -0.07 c. 0.47 to 0.85 d. 0.44 to 1.12

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Linear Algebra

Authors: Jim Hefferon

1st Edition

978-0982406212, 0982406215

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

find all matrices A (a) A = 13 (b) A + A = 213

Answered: 1 week ago