an essay answering the following questions and including more information (using free academic references, intext citation and using examplesfrom the text I have provided): NO AI GENERATOR PLEASE

1-Discuss the ways in which wrong decision making can impact the success of a project. 2-Highlight the various leadership styles that were utilized in the case.Give examples specifically from the case. 4-Identify instances in which soft/people skills were utilized. How effective were these? 5-Identified and clearly/concisely stated the problem, including the decision to be made within the context of the case. 6- Summarized the pertinent facts in the case to describe the background 7- Demonstrated a thorough analysis supported by evidence from the case. The analysis should be guided by the case questions and should apply course concepts. 8-Identified a viable set of alternatives to solve the stated problem and effectively evaluated the identified alternatives. 9- Recommended the most viable solution. 10- Defined a clear action plan. 11- Included all 6 case study analysis methodology steps with headings

TEXT: Impact of Wrong Decision Making on Project Success: Wrong decision making can have significant implications for the success of a project. In the case, we see instances where poor decisions led to delays, inefficiencies, and ultimately, challenges in achieving project objectives. For example, Johan's reluctance to delegate tasks and trust his team in the Sweden project led to bottlenecks and inefficiencies, impacting the project timeline. Similarly, Lucas' decision to maintain distance from the project and not actively participate in problem-solving resulted in a lack of support for resolving issues promptly. These examples illustrate how wrong decision making can hinder progress, increase costs, and jeopardize the overall success of a project.(Banerjee, 2017) Leadership Styles Utilized in the Case: The case demonstrates various leadership styles employed by different managers in different contexts: Lucas (Sweden): Exhibited a laissez-faire leadership style by maintaining distance from the project and expecting issues to be resolved by Johan without active involvement. (Banerjee, 2017) Johan (Sweden): Demonstrated an autocratic leadership style by making decisions in isolation and not effectively delegating tasks, leading to bottlenecks and inefficiencies.(Banerjee, 2017) Hubert (Germany): Displayed a transformational leadership style by building a structured project execution team, fostering trust and camaraderie, and empowering his team to take ownership of their responsibilities.(Banerjee, 2017) Utilization of Soft/People Skills: Soft/people skills were crucial in fostering effective collaboration, communication, and team dynamics in the case: Hubert (Germany): Demonstrated strong trust-building, team-building, and motivational skills, as evidenced by his high scores in the comparative analysis. His inclusive approach and ability to judge and invest in people contributed to the success of the project.(Banerjee, 2017) Lucas and Johan (Sweden): Lacked effective soft/people skills, leading to challenges in team collaboration, motivation, and trust.(Banerjee, 2017) Problem Statement: The problem in the case revolves around the ineffective management and leadership approaches employed by Lucas and Johan, leading to delays, inefficiencies, and challenges in achieving project objectives.(Banerjee, 2017) Background Summary: The case involves the transformation journey of multiple manufacturing plants in different countries, led by different project managers. Each manager faced unique challenges in implementing IT systems and processes, with varying degrees of success.(Banerjee, 2017) Thorough Analysis: The analysis highlights the impact of wrong decision making on project success, identifies leadership styles utilized in the case, and evaluates the effectiveness of soft/people skills in achieving project objectives.(Banerjee, 2017)