An experiment examined the impact of THC (the active ingredient in marijuana) on various physiological and psychological variables. The study recruited a sample of 18 young adults who were habitual marijuana smokers. Subjects came to the lab 3 times, each time smoking a different marijuana cigarette: one with 3.9% THC, one with 1.8% THC, and one with no THC (a placebo). The order of the conditions was randomized in a double-blind design.

At the start of each session, no subject reported being "high." After smoking the cigarette, participants rated how "high" they felt, using a positive continuous scale (0 representing not at all "high"). For the placebo condition, participants reported a mean "high" feeling of 11.3, with a standard deviation of 15.5. Is there evidence of a significant placebo effect, with subject feeling significantly "high" after smoking a placebo marijuana cigarette?

What would be the appropriate null and alternative hypothesis?

I understand the are trying to determine if there is feeling of being high while using a placebo with not feeling high being "0" on the scale. I am having difficulty in determining how to write out the null/alternative hypothesis.