Analysts have considered how the merger might give Comcast "a dominant position" and "For consumers, the deal would mean the union of two companies that are already reviled for their poor customer service and high prices. Greater size will fix neither problem..." a) Why might greater size of a firm, in some cases, lead to lower costs that could then be passed on to consumers? b) Why do you think greater size will not lead to better customer service or lower costs in this case? Use information from the chapters on perfect competition or monopoly to help you answer these questions