Anna, a supplier of school equipmentsent an email toJack on 20th January requiring him tosupply her a quotation of 300 units of school desks. On the same day, Jacksent her the requested quotation at total price of RM12 000. On22ndJanuary, Jack made an order of 300 units of school desk to ABC Sdn Bhd to be delivered to Anna.

Anna on the other hand had made a purchase order toABC Sdn Bhd on24th January for the supply of300 units of school desks at the price of RM10,000. It was agreed thatAnna paid half of the price, while theremaining balance was to be made at delivery scheduled on 30th January. Two days before the delivery, the factory was seriouslydamaged by a flash flood. Consequently, ABC Sdn Bhd was unable to deliver the order as agreed.

On the same day, Jack called Anna requesting her to specify the date of delivery of the 300 units and make the payment of the quoted price. Annarefused to pay as she claimed that she had never made an order from him. Jack threatened to sue her in the court for breach of contract.

Meanwhile, on30th January, the ABC Sdn Bhd informed Anna of its inability to supply the desks. Anna was very upset and wished to sue ABC Sdn Bhd for breach of contract and refund.

By virtue ofMalaysian Contracts Act 1950 anddecided case laws, discuss all thecontractual issuesin the above case. Discuss also theposition of Islamic Law relating to the above issues.

(20 MARKS)