ANOVA Political party affiliation Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 64.024 4 16.006 3.733 005 Within Groups 9904.017 2310 4.287 Total 9968.041 2314 ANOVA Effect Sizes 95% Confidence Interval Point Estimate Lower Upper Political party affiliation Eta-squared 006 001 013 Epsilon-squared 005 -.001 011 Omega-squared Fixed- 005 -,001 011 effect Omega-squared Random- 001 000 003 effect a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model. b. Negative but less biased estimates are retained, not rounded to zero.Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: Political party affiliation Tukey HSD 95% Confidence Interval 40 R's highest degree @)R's highest degree Difference (IJ) Bid. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound LT HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL .374 142 01 JUNIOR COLLEGE 305 197 520 23 BACHELOR LEZ' 161 480 -.68 20 GRADUATE 098 185 984 -.41 HIGH SCHOOL LT HIGH SCHOOL 374 142 -.01 .7B JUNIOR COLLEGE 089 161 -.37 .51 BACHELOR .137 114 751 -.17 45 GRADUATE 472 146 011 07 JUNIOR COLLEGE LT HIGH SCHOOL 305 197 520 -.23 84 HIGH SCHOOL -.069 161 -.51 37 4073HOVA 177 995 .42 55 GRADUATE 409 198 258 -.14 95 BACHELOR LT HIGH SCHOOL 161 .20 HIGH SCHOOL .137 114 751 -.45 .17 JUNIOR COLLEGE -.068 177 905 -.55 42 GRADUATE 335 164 745 -,11 78 GRADUATE LT HIGH SCHOOL .098 984 .60 41 HIGH SCHOOL 472 146 .011 -.97 -07 JUNIOR COLLEGE .403 149 256 -.95 .14 BACHELOR .395 184 248 -.79 .11 The mean difference is significand at the 0.05 level. Political party affiliation Tukey HSD#.b Subset for alpha = 0.05 R's highest degree N 2 GRADUATE 243 2.53 LT HIGH SCHOOL 259 2.63 2.63 BACHELOR 462 2.87 2.87 JUNIOR COLLEGE 194 2.94 2.94 HIGH SCHOOL 1157 3.01 Sig. 110 .164 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets areCHI SQUARE Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Tota N Percent N Percent N Percent Political party affiliation * 1536 65.4% 812 34.6% 2348 100,0% Can people be trusted Political party affiliation * Can people be trusted Crosstabulation Count Can people be trusted Can't be too CAN TRUST careful DEPENDS Total Political party affiliation STRONG DEMOCRAT 95 138 15 248 NOT STR DEMOCRAT 69 154 229 IND, NEAR DEM 70 135 211 INDEPENDENT 49 194 21 264 IND.NEAR REP 55 117 3 175 NOT STR REPUBLICAN 105 8 177 STRONG REPUBLICAN 69 102 179 OTHER PARTY 18 34 53 Total 489 979 68 1536Group Statistics Political party affiliation N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Race of respondent NOT STR DEMOCRAT 352 1.53 731 039 IND NEAR DEM 307 1.48 .747 043 Independent Samples Test Leverie's Test for Equality of Variances blest for Equally of Means 84% Confidence Interval of the Significance Mean Stol Ener Diference F Eig er Ore.Sided p Two-Siced p Dinerence Dierence Lower Upper Race of respondent Equal variances assumed 005 942 853 .197 394 049 -.064 162 Equal variances no. 851 640.974 197 .395 049 - 064 163 Independent Samples Effect Sizes 95% Confidence Interval Standardizer" Point Estimate Lower Upper Race of respondent Cohen's d .73B 067 -.087 220 Hedges' correction .739 .066 -.086 .219 Glass's delta .747 .066 -.087 .219 a. The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes. Cohen's d uses the pooled standard deviation, Hedges' correction uses the pooled standard deviation, plus a correction factor. Glass's delta uses the sample standard deviation of the control (i.e., the second) group