answer all the questions on the right including the summary using the information on the left page

weight after launch : 24.0 Launch # 10 Part 2: What was your assigned role? Predicted from your worksheet = % difference = Partner 1 Name and role Sara Velazquez and made engines / looked for 3SE range = Partner 2 Name and role Antonio Vargas and measured the angle For your Summary include Data and Statistics: . Measured angles (in a table) Heights calculated from angles (table) Conditions during the launch? Windy? Did your rocket go straight up? Towards altimeters? Away from altimeters? Did it spin? etc. Average and standard error (SE) of heights, AVE + SE rounded 3SE range of heights . % difference between predicted height and average of heights Our rocket went straight up and then at the very : top it started to go off to the right straight down. Summary Were you within 5% of the predicted? It went away from altimeters. It was not windy and it did not spin . Within 3SE of the predicted? Random Error - variation in trials. Always discuss. If not within 3SE possible sources of systematic error. Discuss sources of error in terms of cause and effects that are reasonable. Put some effort into this part. Consider assumptions we made in the prediction, atmospheric characteristics, how your construction technique may affect the final height, what the measuring precision is for launch day (distances on the Part 3 : Enter your Trial angles. Be sure to record in your lab books. If someone didn't ground, angles), how might the individual heights of the people measuring get a measurement leave spaces empty. angles affect results, how a launch that is not perfectly vertical might affect the Trial angles measured. Angle (" ) H (m ) 49 812.0 odysova Assumed parameters In making our prediction there are many parameters; a few are given for you to enter 2 52 96.0 into the equations. The accuracy of these can affect your prediction. Think of three. 3 53 4 100 48 5 83.0 WN 49 72.0 Self-reflection. Briefly comment on how these two rocket labs fulfill the following GE learning 42 68.0 objectives: 64 154 Quantitative reasoning 50 89.0 Disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge 54 Creative problem solving 103 Communication 10 50 89, 0 Average experimental height in meters = 94 m Standard deviation in meters = 2 2- 6 m Standard error in meters = 7.15m