Answer any 2 of 3 the questions below

1. Thinking about eyewitness testimony as it pertains to witnessing criminal actions, what changes should be made to the ways in which eyewitness testimony is collected, the ways in which suspect line-ups are conducted, and to the direction/advice offered to jurors as to how heavily to weight or value such eyewitness testimony?

2. With respect to Dr. Loftus's studies implanting both good and bad false memories, tell me whether you think parents, teachers, and other authorities should use these techniques to plant false memories, and in what specific instances should they use them? If you do not think they should use these techniques, tell me why not, and explain what danger you see in their use.

3. Although Dr. Loftus primarily highlights the false eyewitness testimony that put a white man in jail for a crime he didn't commit, the research suggests that this is disproportionately more likely to happen to people of colour. How might our reliance on eyewitness testimony be further complicated by our identity-based biases, and how might that influence the outcomes for people of colour who are accused and put on trial for criminal offences?