** Answer each question. Discuss the facts and lawand conclude any legal and ethical violations and party losses. For analysis, make appropriate assumptions.

1. Summarize therelevant factsof the case as they relate to each party.
2. What is the impact on the case's outcome?
3. List asummary of the issuesas they relate to each party.
4. Identify & discuss therelevant lawto be applied to each issue. At least three legal citations.
5. Write your conclusion in anobjective (not subjective) manner.
6. Describes the legal rationale supporting your decision.
7. What are the legal principles being applied to the facts that support your conclusion?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scenario

Nigel and Karla couldn't have children. Karla found an ad for a Los Angeles reproductive clinic in a Nevada magazine and sent an online contact form query. New patient coordinator Maria answered. Karla was told the fertility clinic would handle the full IVF process and had a 98% success rate. Karla received a Los Angeles IVF contract from Maria. per IVF treatment. Sperm and egg retrievals are additional. Karla didn't show Nigel or sign or return the contract. Nigel provided sperm for Karla's three egg retrievals in Los Angeles.A girl was born after IVF.Genetic testing was recommended by Karla's Nevada obstetrician. A healthy fetus was found, but the couple was unlikely biological parents. To prevent a custody battle, the couple aborted.The New Baby Clinic impregnated the mother-to-be with a stranger's eggs. They further accuse the clinic of losing Karla's eggs and not revealing if they were implanted into a stranger, perhaps giving away their biological child. Nigel is concerned that a stranger fathered a child using his sperm.