answer questions 4-12 if possible

4. Compare the true and fair view of the United Kingdom, the present fairly out- look of the United States, and the legalistic view of the Continental model. 5. What are the different conceptions of the true and fair view? 6. Why has no Continental model country developed a conceptual framework? 7. What is the relationship between the IFAC and IASB? 8. What are the main distinctions between the Anglo-American and the Continental models? 9. How does the role of government differ in the United Kingdom and the United States relative to financial reporting? 10. What are the possible implications if accountants outsource the balance sheet to external appraisers (applying fair value accounting) for period-end financial statement reporting? 11. For years the FASB had little interest in pursuing international harmonization projects. What prompted its seemingly new interest in 2002 to work with the IASB in such a cooperative manner? 12. Evaluate the IASB's approach to convergence. 13. As Schipper sees it, why do the rules-based and principles-based approaches to standard setting tend to converge? 14. How will the role of national standard-setting bodies be affected by adoption of IASB standards? 15. How do de facto harmonization and de jure harmonization differ from each other? What are the advantages of convergence/harmonization of accounting standards? 17. Is the revenue-expense orient the revenue-expense orientation consistent with fair value measurement